Repulsive-Point-Thermo-Elasticity

for Solids at Extreme Pressures and Temperatures based on Shear

An Excellent Way to predict the Elastic Properties of Solids

An Important Method to Measure Pressure and Temperature in Solids

The Graphs Below Highlight a Selection of the Materials Studied

updated on                                                                                      October 30, 2023

Repulsive point thermo-elasticity is used in reference [8] to describe the temperature and pressure dependence of the shear modulus in solids.  The figures posted are based on a completely new constitutive law: the shear modulus only depends on the volume as a state-variable of the solid.  The volume in-turn is dependent on the temperature and the pressure.  Swenson’s law from 1968 states that the ‘shear modulus of a solid does not depend on temperature or pressure when the specific volume is held constant’.  This implies that the entropy lines in shear stress vs shear strain at selected temperatures are going to cross which is not possible.  The entropy lines in shear are pushed away from the point where the isothermal lines cross i.e., zero shear stress and zero shear strain point. 

                                              file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/Constant%20Entropy%20lines%201st%20and%203rd%20quadrent%20with%20art%20work%20by%20me%201.jpg

There is now a growing body of evidence of the applicability of this ‘universal modulus law’ in a wide selection of materials including metals, ceramics, minerals and (soon to be investigated polymers and glasses).  The bulk moduli in some single-phase, elemental metals, Na, Cu, Au and Ag were used to establish that the law is truly universal.  The rule to follow is that the material must support a shear stress, i.e., behave as a solid. 

Go to the materials listed below for some of the materials studied {I now have an additional 20 materials in September 2022} I have constructed plots of the log natural (Compliance/Reference Compliance) versus the log natural of the (Volume/Reference Volume). 


 

1.                   Copper

https://hajim.wdev.rochester.edu/jprescot/burns/High_Energy_Density_Science_files/image019.jpg 

https://hajim.wdev.rochester.edu/jprescot/burns/High_Energy_Density_Science_files/1_Cu_Compliance_vs_volume_low_temperature_0_to_300_K.JPG

2.                   Ringwoodite

https://hajim.wdev.rochester.edu/jprescot/burns/High_Energy_Density_Science_files/image020.jpg

2_Mg2SiO4_Shear_modulus_vs_volume.jpg

 

3.                   α Alumina

https://hajim.wdev.rochester.edu/jprescot/burns/High_Energy_Density_Science_files/image021.jpg

 

https://hajim.wdev.rochester.edu/jprescot/burns/High_Energy_Density_Science_files/3_Al2O3_Shear_modulus_vs_volume.JPG

4.                   Grossular Garnet

Garnet – Ca3Al2Si3O12 – Grossular

 

4_Grossular_Garnet_Shear_modulus_vs_volume.jpg

5.  Pyrope Garnet

 

Garnet.png

 

 file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/5%20Pyrope%20Garnet%20Shear%20modulus%20vs%20volume.JPG

6.         Quicklime or CaO

 

 

file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/6%20CaO%20Shear%20modulus%20vs%20volume.JPG

 

7.          Forsterite and Fayalite are a solid solution on the temperature composition axis

On the pressure composition axis the (Mg, Fe)2SiO4 system forms Olivine I and Olivine II compositions

  

 

Olivine I

 

 file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/7%20Olivine%20I%20Shear%20modulus%20vs%20volume.JPG

Olivine II (with a slightly different composition in Fe see structure in Olivine I)

 file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/8%20Olivine%20II%20Shear%20modulus%20vs%20volume.JPG

 

8.         Periclase or Polycrystalline MgO

 

 

 

 file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/MgO%20plot%20of%20polycrystalline%20shear%20modulus%20vs%20volume%20Anderson.JPG

9.         Single Crystal MgO (with temperature and pressure parametrically on same graph)

file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/MgO%20Xtal%20Volume%20vs%20Modulus%20pressure%20plus%20temperature.JPG

10.    Single Crystal Copper at High Temperature (see #1 for polycrystalline copper at low temperature)

 

file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/Cu%20C44%20vs%20volume%20high%20T.JPG

 

11.    Construction of Constant Shear Entropy Lines for Copper

 

file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/Constant%20Entropy%20lines%201st%20and%203rd%20quadrent%20with%20art%20work%20by%20me%201.jpg

12.    Bulk Modulus from Polycrystalline MgO

 

file:///D:/Documents%20Burns/Web%20pages%20revised%2010-16-2023/Old%20web%20pages/High%20Energy%20Density%20Science_files/Bulk%20Modulus%20vs%20Volume%20for%20MgO%20Anderson%20et%20al.JPG